Anti-Covid vaccines finally recognized as dangerous !

Fox News television has just revealed this to the Americans. Jean-Marc Sabatier keeps repeating it: the multiplication of vaccine doses weakens natural immunity.

The truth is sometimes difficult to impose, especially if it disturbs consciences, if it touches big financial interests, if it challenges dogma. Not all truths, even scientific ones, are good to tell. Let us remember Galileo. For having affirmed that the earth was round, the mathematician almost knew the torments of the stake.
The same is true of the anti-Covid vaccines that are supposed to save humanity from a devastating pandemic. Administered massively and under duress, they prevented neither infection nor reinfection, and even less the transmission of the virus. Worse: the multiplication of doses has proved to be more dangerous than beneficial because of the numerous and sometimes very serious side effects that they generate.

“A major risk factor”

A Lancet article published in February 2022 on the Swedish population found “a gradual decline in the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.” In June, a Japanese physician, Kenji Yamamoto, published an article entitled “Adverse Vaccine Events and Measures to Prevent Them.”
Echoing the Lancet, he wrote: “The study showed that the immune function of people vaccinated 8 months after receiving two doses of Covid-19 vaccine was lower than that of unvaccinated people. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent booster injections of Covid-19 could have a negative effect on immune response and may not be feasible. (…) As a safety measure, new booster vaccinations should be discontinued. (…) In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients.”

A causal link

Other scientists have more recently warned of the dangers of repeated vaccination. Stephanie Seneff, Greg Nigh, Anthony Kyriaakopoulos, and Peter McCullough published a paper titled “Suppression of Innate Immunity by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The Role of G Quadruplexes, Exosomes, and MicroRNAs.”

In this article, the scientists present “evidence that vaccination induces a profound alteration of type I interferon signaling, which has a variety of adverse consequences on human health. Immune cells that have taken up vaccine nanoparticles release large numbers of exosomes containing a spike protein as well as critical microRNAs into the circulation that induce a signaling response in remote receptor cells… These disruptions are potentially causally related to neurodegenerative diseases, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response, and tumorigenesis… We believe that a full assessment of the risks and benefits of mRNA vaccines calls into question their positive contribution to public health. ”

A fundamental discovery

jean-marc sabatier
Jean-Marc Sabatier (DR)

If the American public discovers today on television the harmful effects of vaccines (see the video below), the readers of have been alerted for a long time by the articles of Jean-Marc Sabatier*.
As early as April 2020, the scientist published an article revealing the impairment of innate immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 (via its Spike protein) and described the dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin system responsible for Covid-19 diseases.
In December 2020, in an article entitled “What if the RAS explained Covid-19?” we mentioned “the story of a fundamental French discovery, that of Professor Jean-Marc Sabatier, which could revolutionize the understanding and treatment of this decidedly mysterious disease.”
More recently, two articles have shaken up the scientific data.
On June 29, in an interview that caused a stir, “Covid-19: the limits of vaccination“, Jean-Marc Sabatier explained why “vaccination could itself promote infection”. In conclusion: “repeated injections of the same antigen, whatever it is (here the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2), at levels that exceed the ‘critical’ threshold, inevitably lead to a disruption of innate immunity, and to the appearance of potential autoimmune disorders. Thus, for current Covid-19 vaccines, there are at least three good scientific reasons not to give multiple vaccine injections, with the direct and harmful action of the Spike protein on the RAS and innate immunity, the repetition of these injections also disrupting host innate immunity, and the potential harmful effects of some adjuvants, including lipid nanoparticles.”

A bogus fact check

It is true that a fact checking of the AFP came to contradict the remarks of the scientist. A young ”verifier” (with a degree in history!) thought he was authorized to question the information contained in this article.
Jean-Marc Sabatier and have thus brought a detailed answer on May 24, 2022 to this fact checking à la Pfizer sauce.
The historian-fact checker refutes the idea that the vaccine would damage the immune system. Jean-Marc Sabatier’s answer: “Vaccines and booster shots against Covid-19 alter (weaken) the host’s immune system, because the vaccine spike protein is able to act on innate immunity cells (via AT1R and Toll-like receptors, notably TLR4 and TLR2) and to alter their function.
The Spike protein (vaccine or viral) also affects adaptive/acquired immunity. Thus, there is induced lymphocytopenia (related to macrophage activation syndrome and associated hemophagocytosis that kills CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, B cells, and killer NK cells) leading to an acquired/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
Études : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc. »

The truth is sometimes difficult to admit and long to impose. But it eventually triumphs in the face of stubborn facts. The tormented history of Covid-19 and its vaccines, which are not vaccines, will remain in the annals of history’s lies.

*Jean-Marc Sabatier is Director of Research at the CNRS and holds a doctorate in Cellular Biology and Microbiology and an HDR in Biochemistry. Editor-in-Chief of the international scientific journals: “Coronaviruses” and “Infectious Disorders – Drug Targets”. He is speaking in his own name.